I read the Minister's statement yesterday, and although I wholly agree with the government's policy of not negotiating with terrorists, I do not believe that the entirety of the Minister's statement is accurate. Specifically, I take issue with the latter half of the second paragraph:
This government will not negotiate with terrorists, especially when the actions asked to be taken are imposing and not for the good of the people that we command. We are a body of government. We will not legitimize the methods used of those who seek only to eradicate and take a democracy and twist it into a dictatorship where countless lives will be deemed meaningless and tossed aside. The violence must come to a stop, but only in a way that not only truly bring peace but also keep this political system stable.
One absolutely should not legitimize the activities of vigilantes. However, I question the commitment to democracy from a government which has authorized the invasion of privacy of private citizens by the DMLE through searches and tapping, authorized the use of the Unforgivables in such a way which clearly demonstrates that the government views itself as above the law and subject to exceptions not granted the citizenry, invaded private correspondence, and more. There are claims that everything done is done with safety in mind, but is it worth subjecting ourselves to invasion for? There has also been no release of information showing the effectiveness of these measures: How many incidents have been stopped or vigilantes captured
directly as a result of these new laws?
A true commitment to democracy requires the allowance of discussion, and despite the Minister's stated intent, the policies of the government work to stifle discussion and make those who would criticize the Ministry fearful of being labeled terrorists, to the extent where everything they say may be overheard. If the stability of a political system requires the repression of the people and for them to fear their government, that political system needs to be changed.
If the Minister were truly committed to peace and democracy, she would not condone the maintaining of order through intimidation.
*I would like to end this entry with the disclaimer that my criticism of the Ministry is both a personal opinion and that my misgivings absolutely in no way mean that I support any terrorist action or activity. I simply comment on the Ministry because I feel that the terrorist activities and the absurdity of their demands have already been addressed, while the Minister's statement has not.